Thursday, March 11, 2010

God atheism and science; is there actually a god?



I was in my early 20s when I had a crisis of sorts over my atheism. I was about 2 years into my research in the field of quantum mechanics. Things behave much differently on a quantum level than they do within our perceived reality. The mere act of observation will affect the outcome. This has been proven by the Double Slit Experiment in which particles of matter behave differently when their being observed from when they’re not being observed. The simple act of human consciousness changed the outcome of the experiment. I thought how can a particle be aware of the fact that it’s being observed, and are we somehow connected with everything in the universe?




Then as I was starting to feel the mental stresses involved in learning this facet of science; I began wondering and pondering the idea that maybe some form of god was responsibly. I started wondering if all matter in the universe was somehow all connected through a god; or if god was the collective consciousness of all matter in the universe.



Don’t get me wrong; I was never pondering the existence of the Christian god, or any other religious deity for that matter - I had dismissed all of that deluded tripe in my preteen years. One really begins having strange thoughts when one gets into this area of science, and when one starts dealing with the theories and the math involved – the fact is you can’t even mathematically prove that you’re own self is real.



Towards the end of this video below; it gets into the Double Slit Experiment. What do you believe causes this weird outcome?

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comments (3)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
You're a physicist and you don't know the answer? I'm not, and it's obvious. To observe what the particle is doing, we have to shoot another particle at it. You're knocking the particle you're observing off-balance! Of course it's going to behave differently!
1 reply · active 786 weeks ago
The types of equipment which was used in this experiment in the 80s were passive in nature. In fact they emitted no radiation in the form of either waves or particles; they were simply detectors. And even if that was in fact the case; what we would then observe, wouldn’t simply explain all the dynamics at play here in any way. And if in fact the meter was introducing some form of outside interference, this still wouldn’t explain how and why the electrons transverse from behaving like waves into particles and so forth and so on - It’s simply not just that simple! But good try anyway.

One of the hypotheses in string theory postulates that nothing exists until it’s observed – it’s kind of like if a tree falls in the forest and there’s no one around to hear it; does it still make a sound.
www.themodernreligion.com/verses_sci.htm

"What is more, in a century where, for many, scientific truth has dealt a deathblow to religious belief, it is precisely the discoveries of science that, in an objective examination of the Islamic Revelation, have highlighted the supernatural character of certain aspects of the Revelation.

"The Quran contains infinitely more precise details [than many scientific discoveries today] which are directly related to facts discovered by modern science: these are what exercise a magnetic attraction for today's scientists.

"It is not faith in Islam that first guided my steps, but simple research for the truth. [What led me to this conviction was the fact that it would be unthinkable] for a man of Muhammad's time to have been the author of such statements on account of the state of knowledge in his days." ~ Dr. Maurice Bucaille, an eminent medical scientist and a member of the French Academy of Medicine. He is the author of the book entitled "The Bible, The Quran and Science."

You can also check this out: www.scienceislam.com

Post a new comment

Comments by