Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Helium isotope HE3 and the prospects of clean energy:





In a recent conversation I had with my son, he told me that he was considering taking a job offer working in the field of nuclear fusion research after his current project ends. This conversation took me back to the day when I first explained the difference between nuclear fission and fusion to him, and how I felt that an isotope of helium (he3) just might be the key in making nuclear fusion reactors work. I explained to him how heilun3 is rare here on earth, but quite abundant on the surface of the moon – in fact it is believed that there is enough he3 on the moon’s surface, to supply all of our energy needs for the next 6000 – 10,000 years; however, he told me that wasn’t what stuck the most in his head. Back then I was working on a theoretical idea of producing he3 from plain old helium, and in the process of liberating one of the neutrons, creating energy in the form of heat, which could be converted into electricity while making he3 for fuel. Back when he asked me for my research papers into this concept, I had no idea where he was going with this – he used my research to develop his own concept, and after he published a paper on the subject, he received many letters of interest from intuitions that are already involved in he3 fusion research.



For the past week I have been thinking about and reviewing my son’s concept, and having delusions of him winning a Noble Prize for his work. One of the things that he told me which came as a shock to me was his lack of inertest in financially profiting from his work – he’s always been like that?


Back when I was his age, I dreamed of solving the world’s energy problems by creating a new clean, unlimited source of energy – today that dream just might be closer to becoming a reality than I ever dreamed it could be. The sad thing about all of this is the United States is dead last in this field of research. This comes as no surprise at all to me – over half of Americans believe some very stupid stuff – we are a nation of highly deluded people – it’s hard to express the importance of developing clean energy programs to folks who believe that their space-daddy, is on his way back to save them – so why even care how bad we fuck-up the planet.


I believe my son is on to something good – both of our ideas involve producing energy from converting helium into the isotope he3 – his is more complex in concept. If nothing else, I hope his ideas inspire others in this field.


Just think about the ramifications of a program like this working – cheap unlimited clean energy. I’d bet the right-wing Christians would want nothing to do with it – they would say it came from Satan or something stupid like that.

Comments (6)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Are we dead last in this particular kind of energy research or in fusion overall (link?)?

I heard that a prototype fusion reactor was being built in France (maybe Japan?). Do you know anything about this?
1 reply · active 761 weeks ago
I base that dead-last statement on my son’s research in this field, and the fact that fusion research became such a political issue when Ronald Reagan took office in the 1980s. Jimmy Carter had funded a project that had the goal of a successful magnetic fusion demonstration plant by the year 2000; however, Reagan killed the program and then diverted the money to that big pipe-dream called Star-Wars – this was also at the same time when the religious-right had started equating everything about science as something to do with Darwinism – and then with that last anti-science Christian-moron we had in the White House, (Bush) we have really fallen behind in this field of research.

I haven’t really thought about this subject in many years, until my son brought it up to me about a week ago – I’ll see if I can find more links on this subject; here’s one that might be of interest to you – my son believes that Japan leads the field in this area of research.
http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/fascism8.htm
Several generations of my family are (a) nuclear scientists and engineers (or in my case, a former nuclear research engineer), and (b) evangelical Christians. I'd be quite happy if you, your son, or someone else were able to implement a workable scheme for clean energy from an abundant source.
2 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
Be so kind as to relay that to those with a gripe against science.
I always used to get, such a bang out of talking to scientists, who also claimed that they were evangelical Christians; when I asked them what they would tell a child, who asked them a question like how old the earth was, and if the universe was created in 6 days, like it’s said in the bible. I most often found it the equivalent of pulling teeth just to get an answer out of them – most of the time, after much hemming and hawing, most would say that they would tell the child that science points to the earth being about 4.5 billion years old – but, the 6,000 – 10,000 year old bible story, isn’t wrong either – they would say something silly like: bible days and years, were both a lot longer than the ones we have today are.

The fact is that I have never met a scientist who was worth his salt, and who believed any of that deluded tripe written in the bible, in which science has already proved many time over, as simply false, was true. And I have never met an evangelical Christian, who believed in the talking-snake, and the virgin-birth of their “savior,” who wasn’t anti-science as well - and I’m not saying that all fundamentalist Christians, are as bat-shit crazy as the likes of Sarah Palin; but, how do you rationalize all of the bat-shit in the bible – and how would you explain the discrepancies between science and the bible to a child?
The article is nice and I like it, but why so many preconceived ideas and misconceptions in your comments? Are you a scientist or just a pathetic anti Christian? Please think about this: you destroy your good science theories by these rude and absurd words and comments!

Post a new comment

Comments by